Fat black porn movie

Video сomments (23)

Dainos wrote 27.05.2018, 23:09: #1
I ask again. Do you carry this same bias and bigotry against fox, breitbart, cns, newsmax and the gateway pundit to name a few?

Yozshut wrote 07.06.2018, 01:48: #2
I respectfully disagree. It's the ultra-con religious types always talking about sodomy and other people's bedrooms. I mean, take a look at this thread itself. What's almost everybody talking about? Whether they *personally* like or don't like it or whether they have an issue with communicating with their partner about their likes and dislikes.

Faut wrote 08.06.2018, 18:18: #3
Uh oh. Someone else is no longer proud of her country because of the color of the president.

Magar wrote 17.06.2018, 14:13: #4
Without the resurrection, Christianity is legless. Yet we know there are Mormons and there are Christians so it doesn't exactly require evidence for people to believe in something. They each experience something and prescribe whatever cause they want it to be.

Gam wrote 20.06.2018, 22:09: #5
I greatly support religious freedom. There is no reason not to. However you are never protected from my criticisms. If I disagree or want to voice a disagreement with a particular aspect of someone's theology I don't want it to be labelled as "hate speech". Disagreeing and hate are two different things.

Maujind wrote 24.06.2018, 04:21: #6
And do you have an opinion on whether, if fairies are found by science, their wings will shimmer green or purple?

Voodoodal wrote 03.07.2018, 23:48: #7
He has been charged, just not convicted. I think Time's Up is trying to put pressure on the industry to hold him accountable. Activists have tried for years to get his fans to care but they clearly don't.

Yogar wrote 07.07.2018, 03:44: #8
Don't you have an avi pic of Kelly Kapoor in a wedding dress? :P

Mauzuru wrote 12.07.2018, 21:42: #9
Annette believes in YESHUA!! That?s why! She has a relationship with YHVH, you don?t. Stop posting to me if my opinion doesn?t matter. Thanks!

Kigakora wrote 21.07.2018, 01:04: #10
I don't remember too many Mexicans farm laborers doing air traffic controllers work. And, yes, Reagan made mistakes. That's not a reason to repeat them.

Tugal wrote 22.07.2018, 12:17: #11
Of course! Lookit that lil' cheerful face!! :-)

Doktilar wrote 01.08.2018, 18:53: #12
Sure, but are you defining murder as 'wrongful killing', whatever killing you see as 'wrongful'? That seems to be how you are using the term.

Aragar wrote 07.08.2018, 18:54: #13
1. Nope, wasn't aware of that.

Najind wrote 16.08.2018, 07:42: #14
Science denier covers all areas of science denial.

Gataur wrote 18.08.2018, 03:41: #15
How does one believe in "truth"? What is the alternative--believing in "false"? The truth must be demonstrable to all who ask for verification. If you go to a bar and say "Well, the truth is, I have ID that shows I am over 21, however you must first BELIEVE and have absolute FAITH that I am 21 before I can verify it" do you think you are going to get in?

Mubar wrote 25.08.2018, 12:56: #16
there is extremely scant evidence to support a historical Jesus. a look at the indomitable arguments brought by such titans as prof. Ehrman, really only boil down to one point which they make over and over again - Galatians 1:19. it's a bombshell, and personally I think a Jesus, who doesn't in any way resemble the one depicted in the gospels, did exist. but it is a very thin line of evidence, that could easily go the way of Abraham and Moses.

Tygosida wrote 27.08.2018, 16:25: #17
Violence has a purpose at times as long as it doesn't go over the top....

Goktilar wrote 31.08.2018, 19:03: #18
I've done that before. It hurts.

Kelrajas wrote 09.09.2018, 06:05: #19
I exposed you.

Dizuru wrote 16.09.2018, 13:07: #20
There is no civilization without the "oppression" of laws and restrictions.

Mikadal wrote 18.09.2018, 15:43: #21
There's a whole lot of cruddy behaviors in this video.

JoJolrajas wrote 20.09.2018, 09:07: #22
Ahh, how convenient. All the "ex-gay" quacks get together and define each other as "peers," making their work "peer-reviewed." Actual peer-review involves submitting one's findings to reputable journals in an established academic field where it will be subject to review by other experts in the field who may potentially disagree with, not those who have been cherry-picked to support a particular position. The editor of this journal got his degree from Fuller Seminary and teaches at Fresno Pacific, where he had to sign a religious creed as a condition of employment.

Nalkree wrote 20.09.2018, 22:50: #23
I've heard many people refer to the War of 1812 as a war between Canada and the U.S. without clarifying Canada was still a British territory. Big fawkin whoop.

Comment on: